Updated: 16-Feb-2007


  e-mail|grades|nsu|webmail   


The content contained on this site is vital for your success in the class.
Feel free to contact me at the e-mail link above
or at my office listed in the syllabus.

The Latest:

Final Presentation Critiques:

Alpha Group: Score 87

  • Nice quality of presentation
  • Good information, could be more in-depth
  • Need more eye contact with audience, perhaps through more rehearsal or individual preparedness
  • Good careful use of wording 'may lead' - 'may contribute'
  • Nice conclusion
  • The only group to come in on the time limit!

    Peer Evalution Sheet Kudos to:
    Aubrey and Richard

Beta Group: Score 98

  • Nice, relaxed, informational style
  • Abundant, quality information, broad and diverse - Excellent!
  • Admirable handling of a controversial subject - displayed little 'personal' feelings about sides (since you chose to make it 'Informational')
  • Too long (important if time is a factor) 17+minutes.
  • Excellent job!

    Peer Evalution Sheet Kudos to:
    Tara and Meagan

Gamma Group: Score 92

  • Good citing of sources
  • Nice job of matching presenters with topical genres
  • Keep motion down to minimum
  • Good eye contact
  • Tend to ramble
  • Time was almost 21 minutes!

    Peer Evalution Sheet Kudos to:
    Marilyn, Matt and Roy

Optimized for Internet Explorer